Sunday, January 11, 2009
END OF THE QUEST
The quest has ended. I have managed to install a dual boot Win XP Pro and Mac OSX on the MSI Wind. Using this tutorial from MSI Wind forums. It was just a breeze, finished the installation within half an hour. But i did a mistake of not removing the recovery partition, making the MSI Wind unbootable. It is supposed to be rectified easily by using Ubuntu 8.04 Live USB stick, to make the windows partition bootable. However since i don't have a good internet connection at that point of time, i made a mess of the installation. So, i have to remove or reformat the whole HD and do a complete installation of both OS.
To install Win XP for the MSI Wind, i need to use a USB method using USB multiboot software and download the whole Win XP Pro CD into the 4GB USB Stick. It took about an hour for a complete installation. Then the HD is repartitioned using Partition Magic 8.0 into 4 partition. One for Win XP Pro, one for Mac OSX, one for data and one for the MSIWindOSX86.iso. Then i folllowed the tutorial again. However at this point of time, i already have a bootable Ubuntu 8.04 live with me. The Mac OSX installation was a breeze, completed within half an hour. After the complete installation, the MSI is unbootable. However managed to reboot using Ubuntu 8.04 live USB stick and i make the Win XP partition bootable. After that, using Darwin kernel, i managed to dual boot the Win XP and Mac OSX for the MSI Wind.
However the MSIWindOSX86.iso is using a 10.5.4 version of OSX. Haven't got time to upgrade to 10.5.6, since you need to use severel kernel or kext help methods. But i am happy with 10.5.4, which is good enough for me.
Next plan, is to upgrade the SATA HD to a 320GB SATA HD and do a complete installation of both Win XP Pro and Mac OSX again. That would be in a few months time. For the time being, the 160GB HD is good enough for me. Will be using an 80GB or 160GB USB portable HD for my OSIRIX datasets, since it will also be hooked into my Macbook too.
The Leopard HD Install Helper is a great help. It reduces the difficulty of using a USB stick or the need to buy a USB DVD drive. By using the Leopard HD Install Helper, a dual boot Laptop or PC, can be easily be done either using the Kalyway DVD or even IATKOS DVD.
With this Leopard HD Install Helper, I will try to do a dual boot on my Dell D420 and Lenovo G400 laptop at home. Need to find a time first to do that.
Saturday, January 03, 2009
FAIR OR UNFAIR?
In most private hospitals, there are usually one radiologist as compared to a government hospital in which there are at least 4 radiologists. The number of radiologist and the efficiency of the radiologist will usually determine the patient care.
1. Reporting.
In PH (Private Hospitals), reports are done fast, usually within hours after the examination was performed. In Government Hospital (GH), reports are usually late, taking up to 3 days. But usually, urgent cases are also reported within hours too. I usually try to finish all my reports within the same day too. Most of the time in PH, you can report comfortably and decisively. However sometimes, probably less than 5% of cases, you are not sure or undecided. You are pressed to release the report since both the patient and attending doctor are waiting. You don't have the luxury to discuss with other colleagues or to refer to reference books in a very short time. So do you release a vague report or you delay the report? In a GH, you will have the luxury to discuss with other colleagues or to refer to specific reference books. If you release a vague report, will the patient care be compromised? So in this case, will a GH patient get a better care than a PH patient?
2. Image Quality
In most PH, machines are usually cheaper than in GH, since profits are more important. You tend to get less quality images. This could be attributed to less quality machine or less trained radiographer. So, when reporting on these images, do you think you will give a good report? In cases with less trained radiographer, usually PH radiographer do multitasking. So they tend not to be very expert in all modality. In a GH, usually there is a radiographer who is expert in certain modality. This specialized radiographer usually tend to give you high quality images. If you get low quality images in GH, you will usually ask them to repeat and repeat it until you get one. Or if you still can't get a good image, you may postponed the study t the next day with a better sedation. In PH, when you get a poor quality images, sometimes you don't have the time to call your radiographer to repeat the study due to the bulk of films in front of you waiting to be reported. Even when you ask your radiographer t repeat it, you might not get what you want due to the less experience in doing the imaging. It might not be his or her fault. It could be due to lack of experience in doing that type of case. So in this case, will a GH patient get a better care than a PH patient?
3. Physician's feedback
In a GH, we usually have weekly radiological conferences. In these conferences we will update ourselves on the findings of our reports in comparison to the operative findings. We also discuss on what the physicians or surgeons want in the report. With this, there will be learning in both ways. In a PH there is rarely a conference or any discussion with the physicians or surgeons, unless you make your own effort to ask. Sometimes you don't have the time to do it. With this, you will never know whether your report is correct or not? And also you might not learn new things from the physician or surgeon. So, in this case, will a GH patient get a better care than a PH patient?
I will add somemore when I can think of something else.
Comment??